Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 20:42

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Cynthia Erivo Stuns in a Sculptural Beaded Corset at the Tony Awards 2025 - instyle.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Google Confirms Most Gmail Users Must Upgrade Accounts - Forbes
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Baker Mayfield for MVP? Josh Jacobs for OPOY? Long-shot picks for major NFL awards in 2025 - NFL.com
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
ChatGPT Is Telling People With Psychiatric Problems to Go Off Their Meds - futurism.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
No One in the Movies Stays Dead Anymore - Yahoo
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
The Best Late-Night Snack to Lower Cholesterol, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.